![]() ![]() This gives merit to pseudoscience cranks, detracts from the actual science, and creates the illusion of a debate in the scientific community where there is none. When discussing an outbreak of preventable disease, an immunologist will cite the merits of vaccination against a Mommy Blogger who uses Natural News as an information source and believes vaccines are poison. When certain scientific topics are discussed on television programs, there is usually an expert in the field pitted against someone with fringe beliefs not supported by evidence.įor instance, a conversation about climate change will involve a scientist as well as someone who claims Earth is actually cooling. It is also a good rule of thumb for journalists in order to provide a well-rounded representation of a reported topic, isn’t it? Not always- particularly when it comes to scientific facts. The New Brunswick Human Trafficking Working Group works to raise awareness in New Brunswick about human trafficking, both domestic and international. ![]() “There’s two sides to every story.” We were all taught that line as children in order to to stop seeing the world in such black-and-white terms. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |